Information making related information needs and the credibility of information

Monday, September 28, 2020 - 09:00 to Thursday, October 1, 2020 - 17:30

A presentation at the ISIC 2020 conference relating to the work in ARKDIS and CAPTURE projects.


Introduction. Even if trust in the process of how information is made has been acknowledged as a key aspect of the credibility information, there is little earlier research on how and if people use or want information on information making when doing credibility assessments. 
Method. Swedish archaeology administrators were interviewed (N=10). 
Analysis. Interview transcripts were analysed using close reading and an approach based on the constant comparative method. Information needs relating to work process, methods and technologies, context and situation, and non-needs were identified similarly to two types of reputational and four types of non-reputational cues. 
Results. Experienced information needs on information making and the preference of reputational and non-reputational cues in credibility assessments were related to individuals' epistemic distance to the context where information making took place and if the interviewees positioned themselves as insiders or outsiders in that particular context. 
Conclusion. To understand the dynamics and interaction of credibility criteria, it can be useful to look at how and what they are used to justify, and what are their underpinning epistemic beliefs instead of merely pointing to the differences in beliefs and enumerating situation-specific credibility criteria. People's flexibility in switching between reputational and non-reputational cues and positioning themselves as insiders and outsiders could be seen as an opportunity rather than as a sign of their inferior informational competences.

Archaeology and Archaeological Information in the Digital Society shows how the digitization of archaeological information, tools and workflows, and their interplay with both old and new non-digital practices throughout the archaeological information process, affect the outcomes of archaeological work, and in the end, our general understanding of the human past.

Read more

COST-ARKWORK is a network funded by the COST scheme that brings together the multidisciplinary work of researchers of archaeological practices in the field of archaeological knowledge production and use. The aim of the network is to make a major push forward in the current state-of-the-art in knowing how archaeological knowledge is produced, how it is used and how to maximise its positive impact in the society.

Read more

CApturing Paradata for documenTing data creation and Use for the REsearch of the future (CAPTURE) investigates what information about the creation and use of research data that is paradata) is needed and how to capture enough of that information to make the data reusable in the future. 

Read more