Spanning the boundaries of information behaviour and practices

The 2018 edition of the ISIC conference organised (in an excellent manner, thank you!) this time at the Jagiellonian University of Krakow offered, as usual, a plenty of interesting ideas to consider.

It is difficult to try to summarise a large number of diverse papers but my sort of a general impression is that this year we had a whole lot of discussion on novel constituents of information behaviours and practices and links between information practices and other practices and activities. Even if context has been in the focus of ISIC from the beginning, it somehow seems that the community has become better in explicating the context in relation to information activities rather than the other way round -- which has been the traditional perspective. Some interesting ideas to consider further were the discussion on information stabilisation and destabilisation by Trine Schreiber, somewhat-less-positivistic modes of engaging with information discussed in several papers and panels but also several methodological questions raised in a number of presentations. As an empirical question, it is hardly surprising that immigrants were researched in several papers. 

It is also apparent that various nods towards the (socio)materiality and diverse socio-spatialities of information practices are becoming more increasingly acknowledged and highlighted in different studies. The question of materiality was obviously very much on the agenda of the second keynote, prof. Paul Dourish who discussed materiality and information systems in his talk (which I missed and had to follow via Twitter). There was a lot of food for thought for the line of research I have explored in the recent papers on human-technology-information interactions, practical authorship and the ecology of information processes

Our paper reported brief observations of age-group related differences in how people seek clarification and additional information when reading their medical record texts. The study was a collaboration between the DOME Consortium and the HIBA research project

Archaeology and Archaeological Information in the Digital Society shows how the digitization of archaeological information, tools and workflows, and their interplay with both old and new non-digital practices throughout the archaeological information process, affect the outcomes of archaeological work, and in the end, our general understanding of the human past.

Read more

COST-ARKWORK is a network funded by the COST scheme that brings together the multidisciplinary work of researchers of archaeological practices in the field of archaeological knowledge production and use. The aim of the network is to make a major push forward in the current state-of-the-art in knowing how archaeological knowledge is produced, how it is used and how to maximise its positive impact in the society.

Read more

CApturing Paradata for documenTing data creation and Use for the REsearch of the future (CAPTURE) investigates what information about the creation and use of research data that is paradata) is needed and how to capture enough of that information to make the data reusable in the future. 

Read more